Eine neue Gattung aus West Malaysia, sowie Analysen zur Unterfamile Selencosmiinae Simon 1889

Werbung - Partner für qualitativ hochwertige Futterinsekten!
    • A new tarantula genus, Psednocnemis, from West Malaysia (Araneae: Theraphosidae), with cladistic analyses and biogeography of Selenocosmiinae Simon 1889 RICK C. WEST, STEVEN C. NUNN & STEPHEN HOGG


    Abstract


    The selenocosmiine genus Psednocnemis gen. nov. is described from the Sundaland region of South-east Asia. The type
    species Psednocnemis davidgohi sp. nov., which the male was incorrectly identified as Coremiocnemis hoggi West &
    Nunn 2010, is herein described. Cladistic analyses of 46 morphological characters and 39 exemplar taxa from 12 genera
    were done. The genera analysed were: Reichlingia Rudloff 2001; ingroup: Chilobrachys Karsch 1891; Coremiocnemis
    Simon 1892; Haplocosmia Schmidt & von Wirth 1996; Lyrognathus Pocock 1895; Orphnaecus Simon 1892; Phlogiellus
    Pocock 1897; Poecilotheria Simon 1885; Psednocnemis gen. nov.; Selenobrachys Schmidt 1999; Selenocosmia Ausserer
    1871 (in part: Sundaland fauna only); Yamia Kishida 1920. The results presented Psednocnemis gen. nov. as monophyletic
    based on presence of a distal embolic spiral curl in males and presence of a distodorsal spiniform brush on the retrolateral
    surfaces of coxa IV, as well as the reduction in density of hair type 4, located along the proximoventral abdomen of both
    sexes. Two new tribes are described: Chilobrachini trib. nov. and Phlogiellini trib. nov., based upon basal nodes with strongest
    branch support that best reflected natural groups. Selenocosmiini Simon 1889 and Poecilotheriini Simon 1889 are
    revised and redescribed. Yamia Kishida 1920 is placed into junior synonymy of Phlogiellus (syn. nov.); Chilocosmia
    Schmidt & von Wirth 1992 and Selenobrachys Schmidt 1999 are placed into junior synonymy of Orphnaecus (syn. nov.);
    Selenocosmia xinping Zhu & Zhang 2008 is transferred to Phlogiellus, making the new combination Phlogiellus xinping
    (Zhu & Zhang 2008 ) comb. nov.; Selenocosmia dichromata (Schmidt & von Wirth 1992) is transferred to Orphnaecus,
    making the new combination Orphnaecus dichromata (Schmit & von Wirth 1992) comb. nov.; Coremiocnemis brachyramosa
    West & Nunn 2010, Coremiocnemis gnathospina West & Nunn 2010, Coremiocnemis jeremyhuffi West & Nunn
    2010 and Selenocosmia imbellis (Simon 1891) are transferred to Psednocnemis gen. et comb. nov. Poecilotherinae
    (Schmidt 1995) is no longer considered a valid subfamily and is replaced into Selenocosmiinae as the tribe Poecilotheriini.
    Chilocosmia barensteinerae Schmidt et al. 2010 is considered a Selenocosmiinae species incertae sedis. Ischnocolella
    senffti Strand 1907 is considered a nomen dubium. All other genera examined were retrieved as monophyletic in the first
    cladistic analyses exclusive to Selenocosmiinae genera (Australo-Papuan selenocosmiines are outside the scope of this
    work and are not considered). Biogeography of all Selenocosmiinae is discussed; the group is a potential model North
    Gondwanan taxon. A key to Psednocnemis species is provided.


    http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2012/f/z03299p043f.pdf


    Weiteres


    Die Änderungen betreffen die Spinnenhalter nun wie folgt,
    links die alte Artbezeichnung, rechts die neue Artbezeichnung:


    Selenocosmia dichromata = Orphnaecus dichromata
    Selenobrachys philippinus = Orphnaecus philippinus (Danke Stefan Feiler)
    Coremiocnemis brachyramosa = Psednocnemis brachyramosa
    Coremiocnemis gnathospina = Psednocnemis gnathospina
    Coremiocnemis jeremyhuffi = Psednocnemis jeremyhuffi
    Selenocosmia imbellis = Psednocnemis imbellis





    Sobald ich das Paper habe, werde ich oder jemand anders der schneller ist :) , die Liste mit den zu ändernden Namen aktualisieren


    Danke und Gruss
    Martin

  • Tag
    In der letzten Zeile von Abstract, wird "is a potential model North Gondwanan taxon" erwähnt. Ist damit Gondwana gemeint, das sich im Mesozoikum (251 - 65 Mio.) von Pangaea (Paläozoikum 545 - 251 Mio.) löste? Falls dem so ist, wie und in welcher Form soll das ein Modell eines Taxons sein?
    Gruß
    Joachim B.

Jetzt mitmachen!

Sie haben noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registrieren Sie sich kostenlos und nehmen Sie an unserer Community teil!